trucking accident

Managing a trucking accident lawyer lawsuit requires being aware of the different ways that trucking companies can contest liability. These defenses, which range from statute of limitations and force majeure to comparative negligence and absence of corporate culpability, demonstrate how di

Recognizing Typical Defenses Presented by Trucking Companies in Accident Proceedings

 

Introduction

Trucking mishaps can be disastrous, frequently leading to serious injuries and substantial property damage. When these mishaps happen, victims usually file lawsuits against the trucking accident lawyer companies and other parties at fault in an attempt to recover damages for their losses. But in order to reduce or eliminate liability, trucking companies and their insurers commonly use a variety of defenses. It is imperative that all parties involved in a truck accident case comprehend these defenses.

  1. Differing Negligence

Comparative negligence is a mainstay defense employed by trucking businesses. This defense contends that the plaintiff, who was hurt, bears some of the blame for the mishap. The amount of compensation a plaintiff may be awarded may be lowered by their degree of fault in nations where comparative negligence laws are in effect. Trucking businesses can contend that the plaintiff caused the accident with her actions—such as abrupt lane changes or her failure to yield.

  1. Non-Liability of Trucking Companies

Trucking businesses can contend that since the driver in question was an independent contractor and not an employee, they are not directly at fault for the collision. Determining the trucking company's liability at the scene of the accident requires establishing the employment relationship and if the driver was acting in the course of their employment at that time.

  1. Limitations Statute

Trucking businesses also often raise the defense that the plaintiff brought the complaint after the statute of limitations had passed. The statute of limitations establishes a window of time following an accident in which to file a lawsuit. The trucking firm may file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit if the plaintiff does not file within this deadline.

  1. Absence of Negligence by Trucking Companies

trucking accident lawyer businesses may contend that their hiring, training, and supervision of their drivers was not careless. To demonstrate their dedication to safety, they can provide documentation of their adherence to maintenance schedules, driver credentials, and industry standards. It is frequently necessary to conduct a comprehensive investigation and study of documents, policies, and procedures in order to demonstrate the trucking company's negligence.

  1. An Act of God or Force Majeure

Trucking businesses may claim the defense of force majeure or act of god in unusual situations involving unforeseen circumstances like severe weather or unexpected technical difficulties. This defense aims to release the trucking firm from responsibility by claiming that an uncontrollable incident outside of their control caused the accident.

  1. Third Parties' Fault

Trucking companies may also contend that other drivers, pedestrians, or organizations in charge of road maintenance were the main causes of the accident or that their acts or negligence was the primary reason. By proving that the accident was mostly caused by the conduct of another person, they can try to absolve themselves of culpability.

  1. Past Medical History or Injuries

The trucking business may contend that they are not liable for the whole amount of the plaintiff's losses if the plaintiff has pre-existing medical issues or injuries that were made worse by the trucking accident. They can try to claim that the plaintiff's injuries weren't completely caused by the accident in an effort to reduce the amount of compensation.

In summary

Managing a trucking accident lawyer lawsuit requires being aware of the different ways that trucking companies can contest liability. These defenses, which range from statute of limitations and force majeure to comparative negligence and absence of corporate culpability, demonstrate how difficult it is to establish guilt and obtain just compensation. In order to successfully refute these arguments and achieve justice, people injured in trucking accidents must consult with legal counsel with experience handling cases similar to theirs.

If you have any legal questions, please visit our SRIS Lawyer Group. Please contact us at 888–437–7747


roman r034

4 Blog posts

Comments